|
It is currently 30 Jul 2010, 11:46
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
 |
|
 |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Viking
|
Post subject: Re: Next tables to do Posted: 28 Nov 2008, 15:29 |
Joined: 28 Nov 2008, 13:59 Posts: 12
|
I bet this really belongs in an other thread, but since you brought contributing up,  here goes I want to contribute, but i only got these lousy 2ghz machines, so I wonder, is there really any point? What kind of specs do you need to be any help at all? I do have many machines available though. And is there a specific port the program uses? As there are certain port restrictions in our ISP firewall.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
PowerBlade
|
Post subject: Re: Next tables to do Posted: 28 Nov 2008, 15:44 |
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 21:17 Posts: 1218 Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
|
Viking wrote: And is there a specific port the program uses? As there are certain port restrictions in our ISP firewall. It used port 80 to upload and download WU's
|
|
|
|
 |
|
therabbit
|
Post subject: Re: Next tables to do Posted: 02 Dec 2008, 04:28 |
Joined: 09 Nov 2008, 18:10 Posts: 18
|
|
I suggest to make a bigger MD5 tables or make a WPA/WPA2 tables.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
kiando
|
Post subject: Re: Next tables to do Posted: 06 Dec 2008, 14:50 |
Joined: 20 May 2008, 13:30 Posts: 18
|
|
I'd also like to have MD5 oder SHA tables. Why not make a poll?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Viking
|
Post subject: Re: Next tables to do Posted: 06 Dec 2008, 16:25 |
Joined: 28 Nov 2008, 13:59 Posts: 12
|
Are we close to deciding which tables to do next yet? Who decides BTW? I have dedicating quite some processing power to the project now (got my team up to 14th place in under a week :p) The tables we are generating now are just perfect, and I hope we will be generating some clever NTLM tables next  Or mscache for administrator, as that WOULD be useful to a lot of ppl  What are the current top candidates for generation?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
pointp
|
Post subject: Re: Next tables to do Posted: 06 Dec 2008, 16:32 |
Joined: 18 Oct 2007, 19:30 Posts: 323
|
i give my vote to ntlm too (even if there's no poll atm) let's see what PB has in mind 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
the_drag0n
|
Post subject: Re: Next tables to do Posted: 06 Dec 2008, 16:53 |
| Perfect Table |
 |
Joined: 12 May 2008, 11:02 Posts: 829
|
in fact pb decides but you can always make suggestions. btw: we have only been using boinc for two weeks now ... 
_________________
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Viking
|
Post subject: Re: Next tables to do Posted: 06 Dec 2008, 17:17 |
Joined: 28 Nov 2008, 13:59 Posts: 12
|
Hahaha! That explains a lot! I was wondering what you guys had been doing all this time :p Still, I WILL be number 1!  I have made a few suggestions, but I don't know if anyone is keeping any record of the suggestions. I still keep my finger on something like hybrid(upperalpha#1-1,loweralpha#1-9) or hybrid(upperalpha#1-1,loweralpha#1-8,numeric#1-1) If not autogenerated, passwords tend to start with a capital letter, and often ends with a number. Of course bigger ntlm tables in general would have been great, like 1-8 mixalpha-numeric or 1-7 mixalpha-numeric-all Couldn't you put up a poll?  I bet the current tables will be finished over christmas edit: combined my two posts
|
|
|
|
 |
|
flacman
|
Post subject: Re: Next tables to do Posted: 06 Feb 2010, 05:24 |
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 23:33 Posts: 6
|
|
hi... i think there are already lots of ntlm, lm, sha, md5 rt over internet, it would be cool to innovate, do other algorithms like oracle new sha-1, mscache, cisco ios/pix md5, vnc 3des, wordpress, etc...
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Schnitzelwecken
|
Post subject: Re: Next tables to do Posted: 06 Feb 2010, 17:36 |
Joined: 01 Sep 2008, 22:43 Posts: 69
|
flacman wrote: hi... i think there are already lots of ntlm, lm, sha, md5 rt over internet, it would be cool to innovate, do other algorithms like oracle new sha-1, mscache, cisco ios/pix md5, vnc 3des, wordpress, etc... Wordpress uses SALTs, so we can't generate tables for that, unless the SALT is somehow limited and/or broken. DCC-Hashes (MS Cache) use the username as some sort of SALT, so you need to guess it as well, limiting the tables usually to administrator/admin. With VNC I'm not really sure, it used some sort of fixed key a while ago, but that was around 2000. Don't know if current releases of Real and UltraVNC still do that. With the cisco PIX hashes I'm also not really sure - do they still use base64-coded MD5? Also thought that was a bunch of years ago. Maybe someone else can shed light on that.
Last edited by Schnitzelwecken on 07 Feb 2010, 01:33, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sc00bz
|
Post subject: Re: Next tables to do Posted: 06 Feb 2010, 17:45 |
Joined: 03 Dec 2007, 11:37 Posts: 725
|
flacman wrote: do other algorithms like oracle new sha-1, mscache, cisco ios/pix md5, vnc 3des, wordpress, etc... Yes: mscache (user name salt), cisco ios/pix md5 (normal MD5 with password null padded to 16 bytes, output is 96 bits in base64, 24 bits from each variable a,b,c,d) No: oracle new sha-1 (10 byte salt [80 bits]), vnc 3des (couldn't find the algorithm but Cain has a column for challenge... so that means it's salted), wordpress (8 character salt [48 bits])
_________________ http://www.tobtu.com/
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|